On Thursday, BBC's Question Time went ahead with the controversial decision to appoint the leader of the British National Party, Nick Griffin, as one of their guests. A decision which was sure to divide national opinion, a record eight million viewers watched the panel and the audience mercilessly attack Griffin and his policies with hostile questions and answers.
However, as Question Time is traditionally known for their discussions on a variety of subjects and debates, the show was a platform for the audience to jeer and shout verbal abuse at the BNP supremo, who handled the constant hostility and questions about his actions with an evasive nature. For about 85% of the programme's broadcast, the focus (inevitably) was on attacking Griffin and his party, a factor which he doubtless had expected and in some respects, probably hoped for.
Controversial and highly ignorant his beliefs may be, Griffin and the BNP are still a political party who should be given the airtime to express and state his policies just as much as the likes of the Labour and Conservative parties. Question Time has made a name for offering their guests the chance to express their views on television and as a medium for objective debates on a variety of topics. Thursday's edition was essentially a vitriolic hotbed for constant antagonism (albeit understandably) at the man who controversially stated that "if Winston Churchill was still alive, he would've been a member of the BNP", and because of this, Griffin has the chance to play the victim and attack the BBC, saying that he faced "a lynch mob" at the Beeb's headquarters and will lodge a complaint against the network about his treatment.
The aftermath of Griffin's appearance has sparked a rise in support for his far-right party, with a recent YouGov poll in the Daily Telegraph showing that 22% of the people questioned would consider voting for the BNP, and the party's claims that 3,000 people registered to join during and after the broadcast, supporting critics' fears that the BBC have given the BNP the massive publicity it wants.
I had supported the Beeb's decision to give Nick Griffin the chance to appear on television because I, like most of the nation, had wanted to see how he would handle himself amidst a cauldron of disdain and contempt at his beliefs and policies. However, I fear that Griffin and his supporters' cause has been greatly aided, and David Dimbleby aside, the BBC could and should have handled the whole situation better.
Journalism. News. Sports. Fashion. Art. Film. Photography. Opinion.
Saturday, 24 October 2009
Monday, 19 October 2009
Spike Jonze & Kanye West - 'We Were Once A Fairytale'
The highly anticipated project between Hollywood director Spike Jonze and rapper/diva Kanye West was released over the weekend.
The ambitious 11-minute short film, entitled We Were Once A Fairytale, is a beautifully-shot video with a plethora of dark themes, symbolism, and, in an eerie fashion, is a case of life imitating art for the Louis Vuitton Don.
Shot in January and premiered at the Los Angeles Film Festival during the summer, this is the second collaboration between Jonze, whose big-budget adaptation of Maurice Sendak's children's book Where the Wild Things Are premiered in American cinemas this weekend, and superstar rapper West. (Jonze directed the video for Kanye West's single 'Flashing Lights' in 2007)
Watch the short film in its entirety here.
The ambitious 11-minute short film, entitled We Were Once A Fairytale, is a beautifully-shot video with a plethora of dark themes, symbolism, and, in an eerie fashion, is a case of life imitating art for the Louis Vuitton Don.
Shot in January and premiered at the Los Angeles Film Festival during the summer, this is the second collaboration between Jonze, whose big-budget adaptation of Maurice Sendak's children's book Where the Wild Things Are premiered in American cinemas this weekend, and superstar rapper West. (Jonze directed the video for Kanye West's single 'Flashing Lights' in 2007)
Watch the short film in its entirety here.
Berlusconi Judge 'Secretly Filmed'
In the latest in a long line of headline scandals, Silvio Berlusconi has come under heavy criticism from all sides after a television channel he owns secretly filmed a judge who has ruled against him in a bribery case.
Canale 5, part of the Italian PM's television company Mediaset, unveiled footage of judge Raimondo Mesiano taking a walk, smoking a cigarette, and visiting a barber shop.
The footage, which aired on Italian television on Thursday, includes a voiceover ridiculing the judge, calling his behaviour "eccentric" and poking fun at his turquoise socks. The voiceover also points out to him smoking his "umpteenth" cigarette and that he "can only relax at the barber's", calling him "impatient".
This comes after judge Mesiano's October 5 ruling to order Berlusconi's holding company, Fininvest, to pay €750m (£685m) to a rival company after finding Berlusconi "co-responsible" for bribing a judge who was in favour of a takeover deal.
Naturally, lawyers and civil rights groups were incensed at judge Mesiano's invasion of privacy, calling the secret footage "an unprecendented violation of privacy of a member of the judiciary", akin to George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, where the inhabitants were constantly under the watch of a Big Brother-like totalitarian government.
The self-proclaimed "world's most persecuted person" has suffered a string of bad publicity in the last few months, after reports of him enjoying the services of call girls and paparazzi pictures of nude women at his villa in Sardinia.
Canale 5, part of the Italian PM's television company Mediaset, unveiled footage of judge Raimondo Mesiano taking a walk, smoking a cigarette, and visiting a barber shop.
The footage, which aired on Italian television on Thursday, includes a voiceover ridiculing the judge, calling his behaviour "eccentric" and poking fun at his turquoise socks. The voiceover also points out to him smoking his "umpteenth" cigarette and that he "can only relax at the barber's", calling him "impatient".
This comes after judge Mesiano's October 5 ruling to order Berlusconi's holding company, Fininvest, to pay €750m (£685m) to a rival company after finding Berlusconi "co-responsible" for bribing a judge who was in favour of a takeover deal.
Naturally, lawyers and civil rights groups were incensed at judge Mesiano's invasion of privacy, calling the secret footage "an unprecendented violation of privacy of a member of the judiciary", akin to George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, where the inhabitants were constantly under the watch of a Big Brother-like totalitarian government.
The self-proclaimed "world's most persecuted person" has suffered a string of bad publicity in the last few months, after reports of him enjoying the services of call girls and paparazzi pictures of nude women at his villa in Sardinia.
Labels:
italy,
news,
privacy,
raimondo mesiano,
silvio berlusconi
Tuesday, 13 October 2009
'New' Michael Jackson Song Written in 1983
Released four months after his death, Michael Jackson's comeback single premiered worldwide yesterday at midnight on his official website.
The World's Youngest Headmaster - A Shining Example of Defeating Poverty
This made me smile yesterday.
At just 16 years of age, Babar Ali is in charge of teaching hundreds of students in his family's backyard, helping to run classes for poor children from his village in India.
Babar Ali, as you will gather by now, isn't your average teenager. Coming from Murshidabad, a small town in West Bengal, he starts his day early, helping his family with the household chores and, with the help of an auto rickshaw, then embarking on a six-mile journey to the Raj Govinda school as a student, eager to learn.
When his day at the Raj Govinda school is over, Babar Ali then heads off back to his home and, at four o'clock every afternoon, summons the children from his village to his house, beginning classes and sharing what he had learnt earlier in his school to his poverty-stricken 'students', giving them something to look forward to even in the harshest of conditions.
The school now has 800 students, all from poor families. And including Babar Ali, there are now 10 teachers at the school, who are also students at school or college, who give their time voluntarily, and funding from donations means that even books and food are free.
Babar Ali's work has not been ignored in the community, having been recognised already in the authorities. His unofficial school has helped increase literacy rates in the area, and he has won multiple awards for his work.
In an area where families cannot even afford to send their children to school, even when it is free (Babar Ali still has to pay for his uniform and transportation even though the Raj Govinda school is free), this is a remarkable tale of defeating poverty with the help of education. Many of the children who attend his school help their poor families with their chores and work throughout the day, not having the chance to recieve the proper education that we all can take for granted sometimes. Babar Ali's story is a brilliant example of change, and can help better the lives of hundreds of children who are hoping to achieve for the future.
BBC News has a link with a video showing students from Plymouth quizzing Babar Ali about coping with being a teenage headmaster and his future prospects here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/8302225.stm
At just 16 years of age, Babar Ali is in charge of teaching hundreds of students in his family's backyard, helping to run classes for poor children from his village in India.
Babar Ali, as you will gather by now, isn't your average teenager. Coming from Murshidabad, a small town in West Bengal, he starts his day early, helping his family with the household chores and, with the help of an auto rickshaw, then embarking on a six-mile journey to the Raj Govinda school as a student, eager to learn.
When his day at the Raj Govinda school is over, Babar Ali then heads off back to his home and, at four o'clock every afternoon, summons the children from his village to his house, beginning classes and sharing what he had learnt earlier in his school to his poverty-stricken 'students', giving them something to look forward to even in the harshest of conditions.
The school now has 800 students, all from poor families. And including Babar Ali, there are now 10 teachers at the school, who are also students at school or college, who give their time voluntarily, and funding from donations means that even books and food are free.
Babar Ali's work has not been ignored in the community, having been recognised already in the authorities. His unofficial school has helped increase literacy rates in the area, and he has won multiple awards for his work.
In an area where families cannot even afford to send their children to school, even when it is free (Babar Ali still has to pay for his uniform and transportation even though the Raj Govinda school is free), this is a remarkable tale of defeating poverty with the help of education. Many of the children who attend his school help their poor families with their chores and work throughout the day, not having the chance to recieve the proper education that we all can take for granted sometimes. Babar Ali's story is a brilliant example of change, and can help better the lives of hundreds of children who are hoping to achieve for the future.
BBC News has a link with a video showing students from Plymouth quizzing Babar Ali about coping with being a teenage headmaster and his future prospects here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/8302225.stm
The 'Internet Match' - A Failed Experiment. For Now.
In a world-first, Saturday's World Cup 2010 qualifier between Ukraine and England was the first football match to become available for viewing exclusively on the Internet. In an attempt to 'revolutionise' the way fans experience the beautiful game, the match was not shown live on any UK television networks, giving the audience a chance to pay between £4.99 and £11.99 to watch Wayne Rooney and co. attempt to win in Dnipropetrovsk, and high hopes were placed on the latest advancement in live sports broadcasting to deliver.
However, the live stream only served more problems than delivered to the fans. According to reports, the World Cup qualifier attracted only 250,000 subscribers nationwide, making for an estimated total viewing audience of 500,000. Complaints were made about the authenticity of the websites that were broadcasting the game (I typed 'Ukraine vs England October' on Google and several other sites claimed to have the real stream), slow streaming speeds and glitches, and visual quality was at a minimum. A lack of atmosphere was also a key factor; it is common knowledge that watching a stream on your 14'' screen laptop pales in comparison to a 40'' High-Definition TV screening an England match in your living room/local pub.
Another incident which left fans across the country upset was the BBC's announcement after the match that they will be screening the highlights at the later time of 22:15, something that ITV exposed as a "major ethical issue", accusing the Beeb of misleading viewers who paid up to £12 for the internet coverage unaware a terrestrial highlights deal was already in place.
In my view, online football streams will steadily improve as we make more advancements into technology. However, despite David Pleat's optimism for the future of sports broadcasting, enthusiastically claiming that in five years "people will be able to sit on the beach and watch football on their mobiles", nothing beats the traditional method of sitting back on your armchair, drink in one hand and a remote in the other, with a 40" television of the highest quality staring back at you.
Tradition. You can't beat it. Especially with the beautiful game.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)